Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Friday, June 10, 2016


 
Ruben Gomez spotted another test, this one is from Google, he posted about it on Twitterand called it material design for desktop. It looks like the card style design we reported about a few weeks ago.
But Ruben explained it is also visible on the home page and shared screen shots showing how the Google home page is gray in the new test design. It also has a bigger search box in the center.
Here is the new home page test in gray (click to enlarge):
click for full size
Here is the current white home page (click to enlarge):
click for full size
Ruben shared more examples as well as a video.
Forum discussion at Twitter.

 
google us map
GoogleBot typically crawls from the United States, not 100% of the time. In fact, Google recently began crawling on a limited basis from other countries but only to check on local-aware features.
In any event, what if you have a web site that is not accessible for US users for legal or other reasons? Google says that GoogleBot from the US wouldn't be able to access it and it probably will cause major indexing issues.
Google's John Mueller said this in a Google Webmaster Help thread yesterday. He wrote, "In general, our cloaking guidelines say that you must show Googlebot the same content as you would show other users from the region that it's crawling from. So if you're blocking users in the US, then you'd need to block Googlebot when it's crawling from the US (as is generally the case)."
He did offer advice that you can allow some legal content to be shown to US users and thus GoogleBot can index the legal content. But without allowing US users to your web site, you have to imagine GoogleBot won't access it - unless you do things that are against Google's Webmaster Guidelines. John said, " one suggestion would be to have content that's globally accessible, for both users & Googlebot from the US, which can then be indexed in search."
This isn't a new topic, we actually wrote about it a few times including in 2008 and 2011 - the interesting part is the advice didn't change even since the January 2015 news that GoogleBot has locale aware GoogleBot smarts.
Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help.

 
google gold stars
Joy Hawkins asked in a Local Search Forum thread if Google will filter the gold stars shown in the organic search results for local results for specific industries. She said she can't get the stars to come up for specific industries and she is wondering if Google filters them out for specific types of industry queries.
Tim Capper responded that he asked Google's John Mueller (he didn't share the source of this conversation) and John said they do not filter by industry. Here is what Tim wrote:
Just asked John Mu and he is not aware of any filter being applied to industry. He did say that they don't like if the review markup is sitewide or on irrelevant pages. Also they don't like if testimonials are used within the markup.
There was a time where Google would not show local results for SEO or web design companies back in 2009, but it came back a few years later. So it isn't too far fetched to think there might be a gold star review filter.
I do see gold review stars for my company:
click for full size
Forum discussion at Local Search Forum.

 
Like it or not, many SEOs use the disavow backlinks feature within Google which launched in 2012 mostly based on webmaster feedback.
But sometimes the disavow file can cause a headache for webmasters. When you have weird characters in your URLs, sometimes Google can confuse them and not disavow them or show errors.
John Mueller of Google responded to one such complaint with advice on how to test it. He said on Twitter to "try to submit a file with just that line, then rewrite the line." Use this method to check which URLs are causing you problems and then fix them one by one. Sounds like this method can take some time with debugging but I don't know if there are any better ways?
He added that "sometimes special characters are tricky" for Google's disavow system to handle.
Forum discussion at Twitter.

 
I always find it interesting when a Googler responds to a specific SEO question with an audit like response. By that I mean, if someone complains about their SEO efforts and rankings in Google and Google responds with additional qualification questions, it makes you wonder - what does that all mean.
Let me share an example. In a Google Webmaster Help thread a webmaster for slant.cois complaining his traffic is flat from Google. It has been flat for six months and he isn't sure why because the content improves and more content is added daily. His bullet points are:
  • This is a good example page: http://www.slant.co/topics/341/~2d-game-engines
  • Been around for about 3 years
  • Mostly works like a structured Q&A site with wikipedia elements to it as products are a rapidly changing area and our site keeps up with new releases etc.
  • Google traffic is about 350k a month and pretty flat.
  • We've done a lot of work on algorithmically noindexing content until it hits a quality threshold. A lot of currently noindexed pages are still in the index (such as our /comments links) unfortunately.
  • Our content/community is growing really quickly, around 30/40% each month. We also have 24/7 moderation.
Then he pinged John Mueller of Google about it on Twitter and John's response onTwitter was interesting. He asked "If it's flat for a while, look at the pages with traffic: do they change? do the new ones show up?"
The response is interesting.
Look at the pages that have traffic and look to see if they change. Look if your new pages are showing up in Google and have traffic.
Makes you wonder...
Forum discussion at Twitter & Google Webmaster Help.

 
Joy Hawkins asked another excellent local SEO question in the Local Search Forums the other day. She asked why do some business listings get a local one box result, while others return the three-pack?
The example she gave was searching for [State Farm Boulder CO] gives you a local one box. Here is a screen shot:
click for full size
Compared to searching for [state farm boulder] which just gives you the three-pack. Here is a screen shot:
click for full size
She asked, does having a ton of good reviews give you the one box? The example above, that company has tons of awesome reviews. But most of the local SEOs there say no, reviews are not what give you that one box.
Some believe the one box is based on other SEO factors such as your links and PageRank. While other SEOs say it has to do with how specific the query is. The more specific the query is and the more it matched your business, the more likely you will see a local one box.
I think the one boxes for generic terms are way more unlikely to show than the three pack. Searching specifically on the company name is when most of the one box results show. But to come up for a generic search term in a one box, I guess that takes some fancy SEO work.
Forum discussion at Local Search Forums.
Google Plus Profile Picture Size 2016
Google Plus Profile Picture Size 2016

Monday, June 6, 2016



Google Now is powerful, it is very powerful and the power keeps growing (scary ehh?). Google Now is capable of detecting when you are going to a store, such as Home Depot and when you get there, it may show you information relevant to the store.
This includes showing you the indoor map of the store, the ability to search the store's local inventory, their return policy, and even see their special deals for the week. You can of course also see their web site.
But how cool is that?
Here is a photo from Google's Erin Pierce showing off this feature.
She posted this on Google+ and called it "brilliant." Indeed.
Forum discussion at Google+.


A Google search for hotels brings up hotel results in Google Maps. When you click on a hotel listing, it will show you a ton of information, including the reviews. The reviews come from Google but now there is also an additional section that shows you reviews from third-party web sites including Booking.com, Priceline, Agoda and more.
Brad Brewer, who tracks this stuff closely, posted about it on Google+. He said "Google now displays deep-linked reviews from the around web. The review sites appear to be limited to Booking.com, Priceline, Agoda, and for the first time 3rd party platforms ...no Expedia or TripAdvisor. This suggests TrustYou is the primary data provider, with platforms like Bazaarvoice powering 3rd party sites from Marriott to Starwood and IHG reviews."
Here are some photos showing this in action:
click for full size
Forum discussion at Google+.


Brian Barwig spotted a subtle test in the Google search results where Google was adding a shaded, gray background shadow effect to the review stars in the local pack in the Google search results.
He posted this picture on Twitter and asked why would Google do this:
Google Testing Shaded Background Star For Local Reviews
It does look off and weird, and it doesn't seem to be adding much to the design or interface of the search results. I personally cannot replicate it but those who saw it don't seem to like the look.
This is one of many many Google tests they try out daily.
Forum discussion at Twitter.


Last week, Google has updated the address formats used for bulk uploads of your Google local listings. Google called this "improve data for your worldwide locations by following the new address guidelines and sample spreadsheet."
Over the weekend, Elisabeth from Google announced it in the Google Business Helpforums saying:
Address formats are quite different depending on your country. We have made some changes to address format fields for the bulk upload template that are required, optional, or not allowed in different countries based on the format that is used locally. Read more about the new updates here, and check back regularly to our updates page to find all of the latest information on Google My Business features.
You can see the full help document on those format requirements over here.
If you do bulk uploading, you want to make sure your formats are set properly.
Forum discussion at Google Business Help.


Google has quietly released (or hasn't announced the release yet) of the new version of the Google My Business API. The new version is version 3.0 and comes several months after launching the last one in December 2015.
The new version adds new functionality for people who manage locations at scale. Some of the key new features include the ability to read and respond to customer reviews and provide additional attributes for locations, such as whether a restaurant accepts reservations, serves brunch, or has outdoor seating.
Here is a full feature list for version 3.0:
  • Reviews You can now retrieve and respond to business reviews through the API.
  • Attributes Provide additional, category-specific information about locations.
  • Find Matching Location Find and manually associate existing maps locations with your business location.
  • Transfer Location New action on Location :transfer. Allows transferring a location from one account (business or personal) to another.
  • Preferred Photo Indicate which photo you'd prefer to show up first in Google Maps and Search.
  • New Search Filters New search filters include any_google_updates, is_suspended, and is_duplicate.
  • New Location States Location states now also include is_verified and needs_reverification.
  • Photo URL Improvements The API now accepts photo URLs without an image format suffix.
  • Backwards incompatible changes Photos can now only be updated for locations with a Google+ page (these were accepted and silently dropped before). The location_name and category_name fields are now output only. Only use category IDs when setting categories. Field masks no longer require the location. prefix for included fields. Create/update operations now take the location as the body payload, other parameters are moved to the query string.
Forum discussion at Google+.


This is not a new topic, in 2015 we covered that Google implied external links are not a ranking factor and in 2016 we covered that Google said external links are NOT a ranking factor and then a third-party study said external links ARE a ranking factor. Got to love it, right?
In any event, in the Friday Google hangout at the 27:34 minute mark on Google+, John Mueller addressed it again, but didn't say out right that it was not a ranking factor. Although he implied it again.
Question:
Do links within the page to other pages influence quality of that page? How can you tell that the user found what he was looking for when he landed from the search results of the page containing links to other pages?
Answer:
Sometimes links on the page can improve the quality of a page, but I think that's something where you wouldn't want to see that as kind of an artificial factor. Just because there are links on a page doesn't mean it's necessarily good.
We saw that, I don't know, way in the beginning, when people would put links to Google, or Wikipedia, or CNN on their website, and assume that search engines would be naive and think, oh, they're linking to these well-known websites, therefore, the content itself must be good.
And that's definitely not the case.
So you can add value to your website by having links on those pages, but it's not the case that just because you have links then we'll suddenly see your website as being higher quality.
Watch it yourself:
Forum discussion at Google+.


Tim Coling reported in the Local Search Forums that his client received an email asking them to load up more photos on their Google local listing. It said "Photos are missing from your [company name] listing on Google."
The company had many photos of their listings, so it was unusual to see such an email sent to the business he said. Truth is, I never remembered hearing of Google emailing business owners to add more photos.
Tim wrote:
One of my clients just received an email from Google with the subject line, "Photos are missing from your [company name] listing on Google". The client forwarded it to me, and it turns out that while every one of their locations in GMB has photos, Google is now prodding them to enter many more photos in several categories:
Interior photos Add at least 3 great interior photos to show customers what your business feels like inside.
Exterior photos Add at least 3 great exterior photos to help customers recognize your business.
Photos at work Add at least 3 photos that are representative of the services you offer.
Team photos Add at least 3 photos showing your management team and your employees.
Additional photos Add additional photos of your business that don't fit in any of the other categories.
Is this a sign of some new initiative from Google? It's going to annoy my clients and they're going to wonder whether I have overlooked doing something for them. Sheesh!
I have not seen other reports of this and I've been checking for them over the past five days or so.
Forum discussion at Local Search Forums.


Yesterday, In a Google Hangout on Google+ with John Mueller, John said at the 24:20 mark that using the info command on Google will show you which domain Google holds to be the canonical version in their index.
For example, if you search in Google for [info:searchengineroundtable.com], where searchengineroundtable.com is a domain I have 301 redirected to seroundtable.com. Google is showing seroundtable.com as the main domain.
Actually, it is showing the https://www.seroundtable.com/ as the main domain, which is true. Google has indexed https://www.seroundtable.com/ as the canonical version for all the versions including HTTP, non www, all the domains redirecting to it and so on.
This can be useful to see if Google picked up on specific redirect changes of yours.
Forum discussion at Google+.


The topic of faceted navigation is a complex one in the SEO space. It comes up often for large e-commerce sites that have category pages with tons of filer options for colors, sizes, options, etc etc. What do you allow Google to index and what do you hide. What do you canonical, what do you use rel-next and prev for, what do you do with all these pages. Back in the day, you'd give it all to Google and bank on the long tail, but now with Panda, you don't dare do that.
In fact, Google has an excellent and relevant blog post from 2014 on their recommendations but John Mueller was asked this recently in a Google Hangout onGoogle+ at the 40:20 mark mark.
The question was:
We are planning to launch a new shop but unsure how many pages we should index. There are different sizes, colors, materials etc. Is it intelligent to combine every value with each other and let all be indexed? Or is it too much? What would you recommend?
The answer is it depends. :)
He said:
This is something where there is no answer to or no absolute answer to all of the cases here.
What I'd recommend doing is kind of taking a step back and looking at the pages that you have and thinking, is this really something that can stand on its own?
So would I make a page for a blue shoe in this model for this size? Would make a page separately for that, or would it make more sense to kind of have one more general page? Maybe a step back and saying, well, all sizes male and female on one page, or maybe I split it by male and female-- those kind of things. So is this something that would stand on its own or not?
And in some cases, you kind of drill down a little bit further. Because you know this is one very specific thing that people want just like that. And then it makes sense maybe to have a separate page. And sometimes you say, well, people generally just want this vague kind of thing here. And I have all these variations, different sizes, colors on the same page. And that kind of helps solve their problem as well.
So I guess if you think there is enough query volume for specific landing page options, go with it, if not, close it out.
Here is the video embed:
Forum discussion at Google+.


Most SEOs know that if you start a new site, the URL structure should use hyphens to separate the keywords and not underscores. So for this URL for this blog post go with google-doesnt-care-about-underscores-vs-dashes-in-urls and not google_doesnt_care_about_underscores_vs_dashes_in_urls. Got it?
Most SEOs also know that changing URLs for new clients from the underscore to the hyphen is probably not something they should do. In fact, all my legacy stories have /archives/[article-ID].html format and I kept them, I left them as is, for example /archives/014445.html. All new stories on this site use hyphens, which I can control.
John Mueller of Google said in a Google Hangout on Google+ at the 21:41 mark "we [Google] don't really care about underscore versus dashes."
He added:
So that's something where I wouldn't bother a setting up redirect for something like that. If the site is set up on one way and using the other way would be nicer, obviously you could do that. But I don't think you'd see a significant kind of positive effect in search from that alone.
Now, back in 2007 Matt Cutts said for new sites, go with hyphens but don't change your old URLs. Again, that advice has not changed.
Here is the video embed:
Forum discussion at Google+.


After Google going radio silent on the status of Google's Penguin update, as we are waiting on version 4.0 - John Mueller volunteered information on this mornings hangout on Google+. John from Google said it is "getting closer and closer" and he is hopeful that "it is not too far in the future."
He said this at the 23:37 mark into the video:
We don’t have a specific date on the update for the Penguin algorithm but in talking to the team, they feel they are getting closer and closer and I am hoping that is not all too far in the future.
Here is the video embed:
Again, this is really the first time Google mentioned anything on timing around Penguin 4.0 in a long time. It has been 85 weeks since the last Penguin update, that is over a year and 17 weeks ago.
So we are all eager for this Penguin update.
Forum discussion at Google+.

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Why does your website exist? What is the function of each page? Columnist Ryan Shelley explains how an effective SEO strategy starts with defining your website's purpose.




With more than 500 Google algorithm updates made on average each year, how can a site owner build an SEO strategy that stands the test of time?
Defining your site’s purpose and mapping out the objectives you are trying to achieve is the key to not just ranking, but creating an SEO strategy that produces actual business results.
I know this sounds elementary, but SEO is way more that just ranking for keywords. Too many site owners forget this and obsess over rankings. While rankings are important, they only tell us part of the story. Without a clearly defined purpose that states what you are trying to accomplish, how will you know if you are succeeding?
If you took the time to read the Google Search Quality Guidelines released back in November of 2015, the main task search quality evaluators are asked to perform is to figure out the site’s purpose and determine if the site actually met its intended purpose.
While the search quality evaluators don’t have direct control over site rankings, this document can still tell us a lot about how Google is trying to better understand websites and how they impact real users.
Google itself has a very clear purpose, and its former head of web spam, Matt Cutts, stated that purpose as plain as can be back in 2014: “We’re trying to return great search results for users.”

Building a purpose-driven SEO strategy

The first step in building a purpose-driven SEO strategy is to define the site’s purpose. Every other part of the strategy will stem from this purpose.
There are a ton of reasons a website could exist. Here is a list of common page purposes (note that this list is by no means comprehensive):
  • To share information about a topic.
  • To share personal or social information.
  • To express an opinion or point of view.
  • To entertain.
  • To sell products or services.
  • To allow users to post questions for other users to answer.
  • To allow users to share files or download software.
When looking at this list, it’s much easier to see that a site’s or page’s purpose can drastically change the focus of its SEO strategy. For sites that have more that one purpose — say, to sell products or services and to share information about a topic — defining the end goal of each part of your site will help point you in the right direction.
So, now that your site’s purpose has been defined, what’s next? There are hundreds of factors at play when it comes to ranking for terms that will drive the right traffic to your site.
As many in the SEO world saw back in March, Google’s Andrey Lipattsev stated in a YouTube Q&Athat links, content and RankBrain are the top three ranking signals in Google’s search algorithm. When it comes to RankBrain, there are still a lot of unknowns; however, we can take some very practical actions around content and links.

Purpose-driven content

Content is the reason people visit any website. The purpose of your site will determine the type of content you need to create in order to achieve its purpose. With content being one of the main ranking factors, how well your content connects with your intended audience is key.
A majority of people searching online are asking questions. They are looking for solutions to problems, checking out latest trends, feeling bored and looking to be entertained… the list goes on and on.
When building your content for SEO, you need to think about the questions your intended users are asking and create quality, compelling and thorough answers. Understanding these questions will help give you a better idea of your target audience and the types of keywords they are using to find answers to their questions.
I strongly believe that keyword research needs to be user-focused. Just because a certain term has a lot of traffic, it doesn’t mean it’s relevant.
All keywords must point back to the site’s overall purpose. This will help contextualize your SEO strategy and help ensure that the traffic you do generate actually represents people who want to be on your site and interact with you.
When it comes to keyword research, there are a number of ways you can approach this. Instead of giving you a step-by-step process, I’d rather just share some best practices.

How to select purpose-driven keywords

When selecting purpose-driven keywords, it’s always a good idea to start with your brand. Brand focus keywords are a great way to drive traffic from those who already know a little bit about you and what you do.
After listing out all your brand focus keywords, diving deeper into your own content and the content of your competitors is a great way to find more relevant terms. Using other tools such as Google Trends, checking out profiles of prospective customers on social media channels, and even reading sites like Quora will help give you a better understanding of the types of content people are looking for.
Once you’ve narrowed down the list of relevant, purpose-based keywords, then you can run them through your research tool to determine traffic, competition and so on.
For those of you who do better with lists, here’s a breakdown:
  •  Define brand-related terms.
  •  Scan your site and competitor sites for other keywords.
  •  Look at other sites your target audience uses for additional relevant terms.
  •  Narrow down the list and run it through your preferred research tool.
If you’re not sure what keyword research tool to use, check out this comprehensive list here.

Purpose-driven link-building strategy

Backlinks have been and will continue to be an essential part of any SEO strategy. Because of the weight backlinks carry, many have used them to game the system — and as a result, link building has gotten a bad name over the years.
Google has gotten pretty good at identifying and penalizing spammy link-building practices, which has led to SEOs being very cautious and sometimes abandoning link building altogether in favor of content marketing. But, while building and earning links has gotten tougher, it should still be at the core of your search efforts. In order to succeed in search and drive relevant traffic, you must have a targeted, purpose-driven link-building strategy.
When it comes to your link strategy, not all links are created equal. A site’s authority alone shouldn’t dictate the value of that link. It has to make sense within the context of your site’s purpose. Context is key — this is where your link strategy and your content come together.
In order to earn links, you have to have a site that is actually linkworthy. What makes a site linkworthy? Eric Ward (aka Link Moses) explains it brilliantly in his post here, but I’ll give it to you in a nutshell: “Create useful content.”
Now, just creating content alone isn’t going to do the work for you, but when you outreach to relevant sites and look to build relevant links, your content has to be good. As Eric Ward says in his article, “The less useful your content, the less likely you are to ever receive a link to it.”
No matter the purpose of your site, you can create relevant, topic-based content that will encourage links. The reason many fail to reach their desired end goal is that they aren’t  willing to do the hard work.
Once you’ve created the content, promote it to relevant sites and related industries. Purpose-driven link building takes time and patience, but it’s worth it. Remember, it’s not so much the number of backlinks you can earn, but the quality of the links that actually matters.

Find your purpose and work toward it

In an increasingly competitive online world, the sites that build a strong foundation and focus on providing value to their audience are the ones that will stand the test of time.
Defining your site’s purpose and using that as a guide for building your search strategy will not only help you reach your goals, but also delight your customers and make your site more linkworthy.

Copyright © SEO Link Building List | OffPage SEO List
Social | Articles | Classified | Blog | Forum | Profile | Review | Business | Audio | Video | Image | Documents | Que-Ans | Ping | Proxy | Directory | RSS | Search | PR